Legend of Dream God in a Little Dream

Chapter 252 No Pros and Cons 1

"But I don't want that day to come. Weiwei really, really likes her brother very much," Weiwei said while looking at Zengjun. She understood that Zengjun was like a ray of light that shone into her life.

While giving her the dawn of hope, it will also make her fall into a deeper abyss, where there may no longer be any light at all, and there will only be endless darkness all around, like a completely sealed space where no matter how warm the sunlight is, it will not shine in.

"Oh~? What is there about me that makes you so reluctant to let go? Tell me, let me see my strengths in your eyes." Zengjun smiled. He was also here to accompany Weiwei.

"Well, my brother is a naughty boy and Weiwei likes him very much." Weiwei first said this point which many boys have.

"Well, there are a lot of bad boys," Zengjun replied in a reasonable way.

"No, brother is bad but also good. My selfishness has caused you to suffer injustice, but brother doesn't blame me at all," said Weiwei.

"Blame you? Why should I blame you? This is not your fault. You who pursue freedom should be given freedom. And I voluntarily become a step towards your freedom. In other words, I also use this to escape the reality. The dead will not be resurrected again because of my regret," Zengjun said with regret.

Yes, there is no need to say much about the ending of the story, it must be heartbreaking, but this is not a reason for Zengjun to give up.

"You know, your appearance has taught me a lot." Zengjun also mentioned his opinion of Weiwei.

"What are they? Weiwei is just a down-and-out person. If it weren't for my selfishness, those tragedies wouldn't have happened. Those people in the desert died because of my selfishness. Is there really anything about me that is worthy of my brother to learn from?" Weiwei said tactfully, her tone showing her satisfaction with the past.

"Yes, even if you are like this, you still have a spirit that is worth learning from. That spirit of not accepting fate is very high. It itself is just like you, emitting a light that cannot be looked directly at," Zengjun said. These are indeed some of Zengjun's views on Weiwei.

After all, if Zengjun hadn't been so bad that day and hadn't been disappointed because of the person who pushed him off the city wall, everything would really have been different, right?

But when you lose something, you will also gain something new. If Zengjun had not left the desert that day, he would not have met Weiwei.

It seems that Weiwei does not have a big influence on Zengjun's future. Zengjun will naturally understand the principles of the past slowly. However, is Weiwei really dispensable to Zengjun?

Can a person's value be evaluated as dispensable?

But it was precisely the appearance of Weiwei that made Zengjun realize early on that the so-called heaven was nothing more than a place where people bullied the weak. They would carry out indiscriminate killings every once in a while. Could such a heaven really be heaven?

Zeng Jun asked himself, "If I hadn't met Weiwei, would I have really discovered the other side of heaven? Is the so-called justice really fair in heaven? Should those innocent lives who died for this be happy because they were not of my kind?"

Therefore, in response to Gui Guan's words, Zeng Jun asked himself, what is justice? What is justice? And on what basis is it just?

What is justice? This question is certainly not known by many people, and few people would think about it.

They all believe that justice means good people defeating bad people. This is justice.

But is this really all justice is?

Song Jun thought, 'What is justice? If justice is simply the good guys defeating the bad guys, then this kind of justice is so fence-sitting.'

That’s right, such justice is destined to become a fence-sitter, and the reason is very simple. History is written by the victors, and the opposite of the victors is destined to be a scoundrel.

For example, if a invades c's homeland and a wins in the end, history will be rewritten as: c launched a riot, and a, as the representative of justice, suppressed it, so a says that he is just.

But going back to the beginning, a was the aggressor, and in the end, just because he won, c, who was originally living and working in peace and contentment, became an unforgivable villain. Look, isn't this ironic?

So from that day on, Songjun thought about what justice is. What is the justice that people keep talking about? What does it represent?

So the key to the problem lies in how to define justice, what is justice, and then use the same formula to judge who is just and who is a bad person.

But justice is difficult to define. People are a combination of contradictions. The same situation will have completely different meanings if the positions are changed. Is this still justice?

Two hostile people are enemies of each other. This is simple, right? So, what is good for A will lead to disadvantages for C? This is also simple, right?

Then justice is easy to understand. What is justice? From the perspective of oneself, justice is what is good for oneself, and evil is what is bad for oneself.

Therefore, this will inevitably lead to different conclusions being obtained by different people looking at the same thing.

Then, a contradiction arises. Everyone thinks that he is just, because from their perspective, in order to achieve a situation that is beneficial to themselves, they will claim to be the representative of justice. Coupled with the unchanging conclusion that justice will eventually defeat evil, the war will begin.

Yes, this is the origin of war. Dissatisfaction with the distribution of interests causes everyone to say that the enemy is a bad guy from his own perspective. This is one of the reasons why everyone claims to be righteous. The reason is simple: they only look at things from their own perspective.

For example, if you try to steal a child's lollipop and he doesn't give it to you, you will think he is wrong, and you won't think about yourself who is trying to steal it, right? Even if you think it is wrong, but you still try to steal it, then the proof is in your favor.

In other words, what about the child whose candy you snatched? How would he feel? First of all, he was fine, holding the lollipop that was his, but you called him a bad guy because he didn't give it to you.

Then he makes you the bad guy in the name of self-defense, and defends what belongs to him in the name of justice.

Look, a contradiction has arisen. Both parties claim to be righteous. So who is truly righteous? How should you, a smart person, judge?

What you might say is that as a third party, you say that the invasion is wrong, so the defense is just. For you, are you also making judgments from your own perspective?

Right, as a viewer, you can criticize them at will, so the question goes back to the starting point, are you really the representative of justice?